Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
The HC directed the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to process the Petitioner's MEIS applications related to 174 shipping bills expeditiously, mandating completion within six weeks from the order's upload. The court held that technological or systemic glitches do not justify denial or undue delay in granting benefits under government export promotion schemes. Citing precedent, the HC emphasized that digital systems must facilitate, not hinder, lawful entitlements, and that any delays caused by electronic system inadequacies are impermissible. The Respondents were further ordered to communicate their decisions within the stipulated timeframe. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
The HC directed the 2nd and 3rd Respondents to process the Petitioner's MEIS applications related to 174 shipping bills expeditiously, mandating completion within six weeks from the order's upload. The court held that technological or systemic glitches do not justify denial or undue delay in granting benefits under government export promotion schemes. Citing precedent, the HC emphasized that digital systems must facilitate, not hinder, lawful entitlements, and that any delays caused by electronic system inadequacies are impermissible. The Respondents were further ordered to communicate their decisions within the stipulated timeframe. The petition was accordingly disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
