Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC upheld the validity of the summoning order under Sections 208 and 210 BNS issued by the Special CJM (Customs), affirming the trial court's jurisdiction to proceed against the appellant. The appellant's failure to respond to repeated summons from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence justified the summons and subsequent trial. Given the offences carry a maximum imprisonment of one month, there was no risk of arrest upon appearance. The appellant's request to appear via representative or video conferencing was deemed premature and should have been made to the Directorate or trial court, where it remains open for consideration. Finding no procedural irregularity or illegality, the HC dismissed the application under Section 528 BNS, directing the appellant to appear before the trial court and assert any available defenses, which the trial court must adjudicate in accordance with law.
The HC upheld the validity of the summoning order under Sections 208 and 210 BNS issued by the Special CJM (Customs), affirming the trial court's jurisdiction to proceed against the appellant. The appellant's failure to respond to repeated summons from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence justified the summons and subsequent trial. Given the offences carry a maximum imprisonment of one month, there was no risk of arrest upon appearance. The appellant's request to appear via representative or video conferencing was deemed premature and should have been made to the Directorate or trial court, where it remains open for consideration. Finding no procedural irregularity or illegality, the HC dismissed the application under Section 528 BNS, directing the appellant to appear before the trial court and assert any available defenses, which the trial court must adjudicate in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
