Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the SCN issued by the Commissioner of Excise against the petitioner for alleged illegal possession and transportation of liquor without valid permits under the Goa Excise Duty Act, 1964. The court held that the petitioner lawfully purchased foreign liquor under a consignment bond pursuant to the Customs Act, 1962, with goods remaining in customs bonded warehouse custody. Since the goods had not cleared customs and were sealed under customs supervision, the Excise Department lacked jurisdiction to intervene. The issuance of the SCN and subsequent actions by the Excise Department, including unsealing the vehicle and filing an FIR, were held to be without jurisdiction and malafide. Consequently, the court set aside the SCN, ruling that the Goa Excise Duty Act did not apply to the goods in question, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The HC quashed the SCN issued by the Commissioner of Excise against the petitioner for alleged illegal possession and transportation of liquor without valid permits under the Goa Excise Duty Act, 1964. The court held that the petitioner lawfully purchased foreign liquor under a consignment bond pursuant to the Customs Act, 1962, with goods remaining in customs bonded warehouse custody. Since the goods had not cleared customs and were sealed under customs supervision, the Excise Department lacked jurisdiction to intervene. The issuance of the SCN and subsequent actions by the Excise Department, including unsealing the vehicle and filing an FIR, were held to be without jurisdiction and malafide. Consequently, the court set aside the SCN, ruling that the Goa Excise Duty Act did not apply to the goods in question, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
