TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
The HC quashed the SCN issued by the Commissioner of Excise against the petitioner for alleged illegal possession and transportation of liquor without valid permits under the Goa Excise Duty Act, 1964. The court held that the petitioner lawfully purchased foreign liquor under a consignment bond pursuant to the Customs Act, 1962, with goods remaining in customs bonded warehouse custody. Since the goods had not cleared customs and were sealed under customs supervision, the Excise Department lacked jurisdiction to intervene. The issuance of the SCN and subsequent actions by the Excise Department, including unsealing the vehicle and filing an FIR, were held to be without jurisdiction and malafide. Consequently, the court set aside the SCN, ruling that the Goa Excise Duty Act did not apply to the goods in question, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
The HC quashed the SCN issued by the Commissioner of Excise against the petitioner for alleged illegal possession and transportation of liquor without valid permits under the Goa Excise Duty Act, 1964. The court held that the petitioner lawfully purchased foreign liquor under a consignment bond pursuant to the Customs Act, 1962, with goods remaining in customs bonded warehouse custody. Since the goods had not cleared customs and were sealed under customs supervision, the Excise Department lacked jurisdiction to intervene. The issuance of the SCN and subsequent actions by the Excise Department, including unsealing the vehicle and filing an FIR, were held to be without jurisdiction and malafide. Consequently, the court set aside the SCN, ruling that the Goa Excise Duty Act did not apply to the goods in question, and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
