Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC permitted the petitioner to enter the port and take photographs and videos of the vessel, as previously directed by the Additional and District Sessions Judge and upheld by this Court. Despite the petitioner's failure to disclose an earlier CRLMC, the Court allowed the petition due to the innocuous nature of the relief sought. The opposite party was ordered to comply with condition no. III of the prior order dated 12.02.2024, subject to the petitioner paying Rs.10,000/- to the Orissa High Court Bar Association Welfare Fund. Upon submission of the payment receipt, the petitioner was authorized to proceed with photography and videography on 30.04.2025. The receipt was to be scanned and included in the digital record. The petition was thus allowed with costs.
The HC permitted the petitioner to enter the port and take photographs and videos of the vessel, as previously directed by the Additional and District Sessions Judge and upheld by this Court. Despite the petitioner's failure to disclose an earlier CRLMC, the Court allowed the petition due to the innocuous nature of the relief sought. The opposite party was ordered to comply with condition no. III of the prior order dated 12.02.2024, subject to the petitioner paying Rs.10,000/- to the Orissa High Court Bar Association Welfare Fund. Upon submission of the payment receipt, the petitioner was authorized to proceed with photography and videography on 30.04.2025. The receipt was to be scanned and included in the digital record. The petition was thus allowed with costs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
