Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order of the adjudicating authority that refused to consider the discharge application filed by the bankrupt under Section 138(1)(a) of the IBC. The tribunal held that the bankruptcy trustee is statutorily obliged to apply for discharge after the expiry of one year from the bankruptcy commencement date, and failure to do so within the prescribed timeline cannot be excused. The adjudicating authority erred in rejecting the discharge application on the ground that it was not in alignment with the spirit of the IBC or could obstruct asset sale proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that the adjudicating authority must enforce IBC timelines and is empowered to direct the bankruptcy trustee accordingly or pass appropriate orders. Consequently, the order refusing discharge was quashed, and the appeal was allowed, mandating the adjudicating authority to pass discharge orders in compliance with statutory provisions.
The appellate tribunal set aside the impugned order of the adjudicating authority that refused to consider the discharge application filed by the bankrupt under Section 138(1)(a) of the IBC. The tribunal held that the bankruptcy trustee is statutorily obliged to apply for discharge after the expiry of one year from the bankruptcy commencement date, and failure to do so within the prescribed timeline cannot be excused. The adjudicating authority erred in rejecting the discharge application on the ground that it was not in alignment with the spirit of the IBC or could obstruct asset sale proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that the adjudicating authority must enforce IBC timelines and is empowered to direct the bankruptcy trustee accordingly or pass appropriate orders. Consequently, the order refusing discharge was quashed, and the appeal was allowed, mandating the adjudicating authority to pass discharge orders in compliance with statutory provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.