Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of appeals under the EPCG license scheme due to delay in filing relevant documents. The court held that the appeals were barred by limitation under Section 15(1)(b) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, as the petitioner failed to file the appeal within the prescribed period after acquiring knowledge of the order. Despite fulfilling export obligations, the petitioner's failure to timely submit the necessary forms rendered the fulfillment unsubstantiated. The court emphasized that the delay of nearly two years in approaching the authorities was fatal and declined to interfere with the respondents' proceedings. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed for lack of merit.
The HC dismissed the writ petitions challenging the rejection of appeals under the EPCG license scheme due to delay in filing relevant documents. The court held that the appeals were barred by limitation under Section 15(1)(b) of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992, as the petitioner failed to file the appeal within the prescribed period after acquiring knowledge of the order. Despite fulfilling export obligations, the petitioner's failure to timely submit the necessary forms rendered the fulfillment unsubstantiated. The court emphasized that the delay of nearly two years in approaching the authorities was fatal and declined to interfere with the respondents' proceedings. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed for lack of merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
