Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC quashed the impugned order-in-original issued by the first respondent due to a 17-year inordinate delay in issuing the show cause notice concerning non-fulfillment of export obligations under the Advance License Scheme. The petitioner demonstrated partial compliance by producing EODCs for 13 out of 24 licenses and explained the unavailability of the remaining certificates due to the extensive lapse of time. The court held that the delay far exceeded the five-year period prescribed under Rule 226A of the Central Excise Rules and related CBIC circulars, rendering the notice unsustainable. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, and the enforcement action premised on the delayed notice was set aside.
The HC quashed the impugned order-in-original issued by the first respondent due to a 17-year inordinate delay in issuing the show cause notice concerning non-fulfillment of export obligations under the Advance License Scheme. The petitioner demonstrated partial compliance by producing EODCs for 13 out of 24 licenses and explained the unavailability of the remaining certificates due to the extensive lapse of time. The court held that the delay far exceeded the five-year period prescribed under Rule 226A of the Central Excise Rules and related CBIC circulars, rendering the notice unsustainable. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, and the enforcement action premised on the delayed notice was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
