Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under section 114A of the CA 1962 on the importer for willful suppression of facts and mis-declaration resulting in duty evasion under section 28(8). The penalty is mandatory and equal to the duty or interest determined, with no discretion allowed to the adjudicating authority. The importer had misused the Advance Authorisation Scheme by importing duty-free raw silk yarn and diverting it into the local market, facilitating evasion of customs duties. The Tribunal modified the impugned order to impose the penalty on the importer in accordance with statutory provisions, emphasizing the deterrent purpose of the penalty. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
The CESTAT upheld the imposition of penalty under section 114A of the CA 1962 on the importer for willful suppression of facts and mis-declaration resulting in duty evasion under section 28(8). The penalty is mandatory and equal to the duty or interest determined, with no discretion allowed to the adjudicating authority. The importer had misused the Advance Authorisation Scheme by importing duty-free raw silk yarn and diverting it into the local market, facilitating evasion of customs duties. The Tribunal modified the impugned order to impose the penalty on the importer in accordance with statutory provisions, emphasizing the deterrent purpose of the penalty. The appeal by the revenue was allowed, and the matter was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.