Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The AT upheld the Ld. AA's order, affirming that the Respondents' contravention of Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA was a technical breach, as the mandatory FC-GPR form was submitted within the prescribed period. The tribunal noted the absence of any communication to the Respondents regarding the breach, which was directed solely to the AD Bank. The Respondents acknowledged the error concerning a surname discrepancy and paid the penalty imposed by the Ld. AA. The AT concluded that the penalty was reasonable, refusing to enhance it, thereby confirming the order as just, fair, and in accordance with FEMA provisions.
The AT upheld the Ld. AA's order, affirming that the Respondents' contravention of Section 6(3)(b) of FEMA was a technical breach, as the mandatory FC-GPR form was submitted within the prescribed period. The tribunal noted the absence of any communication to the Respondents regarding the breach, which was directed solely to the AD Bank. The Respondents acknowledged the error concerning a surname discrepancy and paid the penalty imposed by the Ld. AA. The AT concluded that the penalty was reasonable, refusing to enhance it, thereby confirming the order as just, fair, and in accordance with FEMA provisions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.