Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that a remand by the ITAT to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration of transfer pricing issues does not obviate the mandatory requirement under Section 144C of the Act to issue a draft assessment order. The AO must forward the draft assessment order to the assessee, allowing them to accept or object to any prejudicial variations before finalizing the assessment. Failure to comply with this procedural mandate renders the assessment order invalid and vitiated by incurable illegality, not merely a procedural irregularity. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, reaffirming that the procedure under Section 144C is indispensable even on remand.
The HC held that a remand by the ITAT to the AO/TPO for fresh consideration of transfer pricing issues does not obviate the mandatory requirement under Section 144C of the Act to issue a draft assessment order. The AO must forward the draft assessment order to the assessee, allowing them to accept or object to any prejudicial variations before finalizing the assessment. Failure to comply with this procedural mandate renders the assessment order invalid and vitiated by incurable illegality, not merely a procedural irregularity. Consequently, the writ petition was allowed, reaffirming that the procedure under Section 144C is indispensable even on remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.