Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The ITAT quashed the revisionary order under section 263, upholding the assessment order under section 143(3) as neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue. The PCIT failed to demonstrate any material difference in facts or law for AY 2020-21 compared to AY 2018-19 regarding foreign tax credit under section 90 for income from the Philippines branch. The AO's acceptance of reconciliation and evidence was sufficient application of mind. Additionally, the deduction under section 80G for donations qualifying under statutory criteria was rightly allowed despite CSR obligations, as section 37(1) Explanation 2 does not negate section 80G claims. Revisionary interference was thus unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed.
The ITAT quashed the revisionary order under section 263, upholding the assessment order under section 143(3) as neither erroneous nor prejudicial to Revenue. The PCIT failed to demonstrate any material difference in facts or law for AY 2020-21 compared to AY 2018-19 regarding foreign tax credit under section 90 for income from the Philippines branch. The AO's acceptance of reconciliation and evidence was sufficient application of mind. Additionally, the deduction under section 80G for donations qualifying under statutory criteria was rightly allowed despite CSR obligations, as section 37(1) Explanation 2 does not negate section 80G claims. Revisionary interference was thus unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.