Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The NCLAT affirmed the NCLT's admission of the Section 7 application against the Corporate Debtor, holding that a legally enforceable financial debt existed and was due and payable as of the filing date. The One-Time Settlement with guarantors did not discharge the Corporate Debtor's liability, as the Bank neither issued a No Dues Certificate nor waived claims, continuing recovery proceedings and treating the debt as unpaid. The application was filed within the three-year limitation period under the Limitation Act. The Tribunal correctly exercised discretion under Section 7(5)(a) IBC, rejecting claims of solvency based solely on unapproved ongoing contracts. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the initiation of insolvency proceedings.
The NCLAT affirmed the NCLT's admission of the Section 7 application against the Corporate Debtor, holding that a legally enforceable financial debt existed and was due and payable as of the filing date. The One-Time Settlement with guarantors did not discharge the Corporate Debtor's liability, as the Bank neither issued a No Dues Certificate nor waived claims, continuing recovery proceedings and treating the debt as unpaid. The application was filed within the three-year limitation period under the Limitation Act. The Tribunal correctly exercised discretion under Section 7(5)(a) IBC, rejecting claims of solvency based solely on unapproved ongoing contracts. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the initiation of insolvency proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
