Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the PMLA against the appellants, rejecting their contentions that they were not named accused or connected to predicate offences. It was held that attachment can be made irrespective of FIR status, and the relevant date for proceeds calculation is when the property is projected as untainted, not the offence date. The appellants failed to prove legitimate sources for the attached properties. The ED's directions for police possession and account freezing beyond 30 days complied with statutory provisions and rules. No violation of procedural rules or requirements under Sections 8(2) and 8(3) of the PMLA was found. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the ED.
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the PMLA against the appellants, rejecting their contentions that they were not named accused or connected to predicate offences. It was held that attachment can be made irrespective of FIR status, and the relevant date for proceeds calculation is when the property is projected as untainted, not the offence date. The appellants failed to prove legitimate sources for the attached properties. The ED's directions for police possession and account freezing beyond 30 days complied with statutory provisions and rules. No violation of procedural rules or requirements under Sections 8(2) and 8(3) of the PMLA was found. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the ED.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.