Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT dismissed all appeals challenging the Provisional Attachment Order under the PMLA, 2002, affirming that a direct, proximate link between the scheduled offence and the attached property is not a prerequisite for attachment. The respondents successfully established the flow of proceeds from the accused to the property through intermediary accounts. The attached immovable property remains subject to confiscation proceedings pending before the Special Court (PMLA). The Tribunal emphasized that attachment serves as a protective measure to preserve the property as case property during ongoing criminal trial, balancing the interests of the parties and ensuring availability of proceeds for confiscation. The appeals were dismissed, maintaining the status quo of attachment.
The AT dismissed all appeals challenging the Provisional Attachment Order under the PMLA, 2002, affirming that a direct, proximate link between the scheduled offence and the attached property is not a prerequisite for attachment. The respondents successfully established the flow of proceeds from the accused to the property through intermediary accounts. The attached immovable property remains subject to confiscation proceedings pending before the Special Court (PMLA). The Tribunal emphasized that attachment serves as a protective measure to preserve the property as case property during ongoing criminal trial, balancing the interests of the parties and ensuring availability of proceeds for confiscation. The appeals were dismissed, maintaining the status quo of attachment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
