Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The CESTAT held that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to remand the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority, as the power to remand was withdrawn by amendment to Section 35A of the Central Excise Act effective from May 11, 2001. The Original Adjudicating Authority's detailed and reasoned order addressing the disputes was affirmed. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in remanding the case instead of deciding the appeal on merits. Consequently, the impugned remand order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed, directing the appeal to be adjudicated on its merits without remand.
The CESTAT held that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) lacked jurisdiction to remand the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority, as the power to remand was withdrawn by amendment to Section 35A of the Central Excise Act effective from May 11, 2001. The Original Adjudicating Authority's detailed and reasoned order addressing the disputes was affirmed. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred in remanding the case instead of deciding the appeal on merits. Consequently, the impugned remand order was quashed, and the appeal was allowed, directing the appeal to be adjudicated on its merits without remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.