Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
The AAR held that the service of regasification of LNG owned by a third party, provided through an intermediary under contractual arrangements, constitutes job work within the meaning of section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant acts as a job worker for the owner of the goods, without holding ownership. The service is classifiable under serial no. 26(id) of notification No. 11/2017-CT (R) and is subject to GST at 12%. The ruling confirms that the activity is a back-to-back job work arrangement, and the applicable tax treatment aligns with the prescribed classification for such services.
The AAR held that the service of regasification of LNG owned by a third party, provided through an intermediary under contractual arrangements, constitutes job work within the meaning of section 2(68) of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant acts as a job worker for the owner of the goods, without holding ownership. The service is classifiable under serial no. 26(id) of notification No. 11/2017-CT (R) and is subject to GST at 12%. The ruling confirms that the activity is a back-to-back job work arrangement, and the applicable tax treatment aligns with the prescribed classification for such services.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
