Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
The HC upheld the factual findings of the ITAT and CIT(A) that construction commenced after 1st October 1998, entitling the assessee to claim deduction under section 80IB(10), subject to other conditions. Regarding disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, the HC concurred with the ITAT that Rule 8D applies prospectively from AY 2008-09 onwards. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s restriction of disallowance to 10% of exempt income was upheld as valid. The Court found no substantial question of law warranting interference, affirming the lower authorities' decisions on both issues.
The HC upheld the factual findings of the ITAT and CIT(A) that construction commenced after 1st October 1998, entitling the assessee to claim deduction under section 80IB(10), subject to other conditions. Regarding disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D, the HC concurred with the ITAT that Rule 8D applies prospectively from AY 2008-09 onwards. Consequently, the CIT(A)'s restriction of disallowance to 10% of exempt income was upheld as valid. The Court found no substantial question of law warranting interference, affirming the lower authorities' decisions on both issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
