Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It held that a corporate guarantee given by the assessee for its AE, without incurring expenditure, does not constitute an international transaction under section 92B. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments on instant coffee supplied in multiple sizes, the Tribunal found the TPO's selective comparison of only two sizes arbitrary and accepted the assessee's explanation of comparable pricing across all sizes, negating profit shifting. On interest for delayed receivables from AEs, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A) that no undue credit advantage existed, and no adjustment was warranted. Consequently, all additions proposed by the TPO were deleted, affirming the arm's length nature of the transactions.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It held that a corporate guarantee given by the assessee for its AE, without incurring expenditure, does not constitute an international transaction under section 92B. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments on instant coffee supplied in multiple sizes, the Tribunal found the TPO's selective comparison of only two sizes arbitrary and accepted the assessee's explanation of comparable pricing across all sizes, negating profit shifting. On interest for delayed receivables from AEs, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A) that no undue credit advantage existed, and no adjustment was warranted. Consequently, all additions proposed by the TPO were deleted, affirming the arm's length nature of the transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.