Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It held that a corporate guarantee given by the assessee for its AE, without incurring expenditure, does not constitute an international transaction under section 92B. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments on instant coffee supplied in multiple sizes, the Tribunal found the TPO's selective comparison of only two sizes arbitrary and accepted the assessee's explanation of comparable pricing across all sizes, negating profit shifting. On interest for delayed receivables from AEs, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A) that no undue credit advantage existed, and no adjustment was warranted. Consequently, all additions proposed by the TPO were deleted, affirming the arm's length nature of the transactions.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It held that a corporate guarantee given by the assessee for its AE, without incurring expenditure, does not constitute an international transaction under section 92B. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments on instant coffee supplied in multiple sizes, the Tribunal found the TPO's selective comparison of only two sizes arbitrary and accepted the assessee's explanation of comparable pricing across all sizes, negating profit shifting. On interest for delayed receivables from AEs, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A) that no undue credit advantage existed, and no adjustment was warranted. Consequently, all additions proposed by the TPO were deleted, affirming the arm's length nature of the transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
