Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It held that a corporate guarantee given by the assessee for its AE, without incurring expenditure, does not constitute an international transaction under section 92B. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments on instant coffee supplied in multiple sizes, the Tribunal found the TPO's selective comparison of only two sizes arbitrary and accepted the assessee's explanation of comparable pricing across all sizes, negating profit shifting. On interest for delayed receivables from AEs, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A) that no undue credit advantage existed, and no adjustment was warranted. Consequently, all additions proposed by the TPO were deleted, affirming the arm's length nature of the transactions.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeals. It held that a corporate guarantee given by the assessee for its AE, without incurring expenditure, does not constitute an international transaction under section 92B. Regarding transfer pricing adjustments on instant coffee supplied in multiple sizes, the Tribunal found the TPO's selective comparison of only two sizes arbitrary and accepted the assessee's explanation of comparable pricing across all sizes, negating profit shifting. On interest for delayed receivables from AEs, the ITAT concurred with the CIT(A) that no undue credit advantage existed, and no adjustment was warranted. Consequently, all additions proposed by the TPO were deleted, affirming the arm's length nature of the transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.