Bona fide disclosure requirements govern under-reporting penalties, and post-penalty immunity applications cannot secure available statutory protectio...
Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1221 to 1240 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.