Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
