Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
The ITAT upheld the AO's jurisdiction to conduct comprehensive scrutiny beyond the initial reasons for case selection, dismissing the assessee's objection. The Tribunal held that development charges received are revenue receipts, with no legal restriction on their utilization as prescribed by the government. Claims for TDS application of income and loan repayment as application of income were remanded for factual verification by the AO, directing allowance if conditions are met. The Tribunal ruled that the restriction on setting off brought forward deficits under Explanation 5 to section 11(1) is prospective, permitting set off for the relevant year subject to verification. The issue of GST/ST deduction was remanded for AO's verification to determine its applicability as application of income.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.