Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the insolvency resolution application against the personal guarantor was filed within the prescribed limitation period. The tribunal emphasized that the OTS proposal, though not submitted before the Adjudicating Authority, was a material acknowledgment of debt extending the limitation period. The letter dated 19.03.2018 by the appellant as director acknowledged the debt and the failure of the restructuring agreement, thereby reviving limitation. The limitation period commenced from the expiry of the 60-day notice under Section 13(2) and was extended by the acknowledgment letter, making the application served on 10.05.2022 timely. The appeal lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the insolvency resolution application against the personal guarantor was filed within the prescribed limitation period. The tribunal emphasized that the OTS proposal, though not submitted before the Adjudicating Authority, was a material acknowledgment of debt extending the limitation period. The letter dated 19.03.2018 by the appellant as director acknowledged the debt and the failure of the restructuring agreement, thereby reviving limitation. The limitation period commenced from the expiry of the 60-day notice under Section 13(2) and was extended by the acknowledgment letter, making the application served on 10.05.2022 timely. The appeal lacked merit and was accordingly dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
