Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC found that the detenue was held in illegal custody by respondents beyond the constitutionally mandated 24-hour period, violating Article 22 fundamental rights. The detenue was arrested at 12:02 PM on 04.06.2025 but produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate only at 9:25 PM on 05.06.2025. The court issued show cause notice to respondents for potential contempt proceedings regarding obstruction of the Warrant Officer's duties and snatching official papers. Additional Director General GST was directed to file affidavit detailing officials present at Central Revenue Building during specified hours and CCTV installation status. Matter adjourned to 18.07.2025 for further proceedings.
HC found that the detenue was held in illegal custody by respondents beyond the constitutionally mandated 24-hour period, violating Article 22 fundamental rights. The detenue was arrested at 12:02 PM on 04.06.2025 but produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate only at 9:25 PM on 05.06.2025. The court issued show cause notice to respondents for potential contempt proceedings regarding obstruction of the Warrant Officer's duties and snatching official papers. Additional Director General GST was directed to file affidavit detailing officials present at Central Revenue Building during specified hours and CCTV installation status. Matter adjourned to 18.07.2025 for further proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.