Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
HC dismissed petition seeking recall of bail order granted to respondent charged with CGST evasion worth crores. Petitioner argued bail was granted merely one month after rejection of second application without changed circumstances. HC held filing of chargesheet constituted material change in circumstances, shifting considerations from investigation cooperation to triple test criteria including flight risk, witness influence, and evidence tampering. Court found documentary evidence unlikely to be tampered, no flight risk demonstrated, and no witness influence potential. CMM's discretion in granting bail was properly exercised with no abuse of liberty shown or trial hampering evidenced, warranting dismissal.
HC dismissed petition seeking recall of bail order granted to respondent charged with CGST evasion worth crores. Petitioner argued bail was granted merely one month after rejection of second application without changed circumstances. HC held filing of chargesheet constituted material change in circumstances, shifting considerations from investigation cooperation to triple test criteria including flight risk, witness influence, and evidence tampering. Court found documentary evidence unlikely to be tampered, no flight risk demonstrated, and no witness influence potential. CMM's discretion in granting bail was properly exercised with no abuse of liberty shown or trial hampering evidenced, warranting dismissal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.