Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC held that sales tax incentives received by the assessee under 1979 and 1983 state government schemes constituted capital receipts not chargeable to tax. Applying the "purpose test," the court determined the incentives were granted specifically for establishing new industrial units in developing areas to promote industrialization, not for enabling profitable business operations. The adjustment of incentives against sales tax liability upon production commencement did not alter the scheme's fundamental purpose. The court relied on precedents from Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. and Chaphalkar Brothers cases. Additionally, foreign exchange losses on balance sheet date were allowed as deductible expenditure under Section 37(1), following Woodward Governor India precedent. Decision favored the assessee against revenue.
The HC held that sales tax incentives received by the assessee under 1979 and 1983 state government schemes constituted capital receipts not chargeable to tax. Applying the "purpose test," the court determined the incentives were granted specifically for establishing new industrial units in developing areas to promote industrialization, not for enabling profitable business operations. The adjustment of incentives against sales tax liability upon production commencement did not alter the scheme's fundamental purpose. The court relied on precedents from Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd. and Chaphalkar Brothers cases. Additionally, foreign exchange losses on balance sheet date were allowed as deductible expenditure under Section 37(1), following Woodward Governor India precedent. Decision favored the assessee against revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.