Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding application of Section 50C for capital gains computation. The assessee had entered into a registered agreement to sell prior to 16.09.2004 with a payment schedule, followed by execution of the sale deed on 16.09.2004 when circle rates were revised upwards. The Revenue contended that the revised circle rate on the sale deed date should apply under Section 50C. The HC held that since the transaction value was commensurate with the circle rate at the material time of the original agreement, subsequent circle rate increases would not affect Section 50C application. The decision followed the precedent in Modipon Limited, confirming that the proviso to Section 50C does not apply retrospectively when the original transaction value matched prevailing circle rates.
The HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding application of Section 50C for capital gains computation. The assessee had entered into a registered agreement to sell prior to 16.09.2004 with a payment schedule, followed by execution of the sale deed on 16.09.2004 when circle rates were revised upwards. The Revenue contended that the revised circle rate on the sale deed date should apply under Section 50C. The HC held that since the transaction value was commensurate with the circle rate at the material time of the original agreement, subsequent circle rate increases would not affect Section 50C application. The decision followed the precedent in Modipon Limited, confirming that the proviso to Section 50C does not apply retrospectively when the original transaction value matched prevailing circle rates.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
