Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding application of Section 50C for capital gains computation. The assessee had entered into a registered agreement to sell prior to 16.09.2004 with a payment schedule, followed by execution of the sale deed on 16.09.2004 when circle rates were revised upwards. The Revenue contended that the revised circle rate on the sale deed date should apply under Section 50C. The HC held that since the transaction value was commensurate with the circle rate at the material time of the original agreement, subsequent circle rate increases would not affect Section 50C application. The decision followed the precedent in Modipon Limited, confirming that the proviso to Section 50C does not apply retrospectively when the original transaction value matched prevailing circle rates.
The HC dismissed the Revenue's appeal regarding application of Section 50C for capital gains computation. The assessee had entered into a registered agreement to sell prior to 16.09.2004 with a payment schedule, followed by execution of the sale deed on 16.09.2004 when circle rates were revised upwards. The Revenue contended that the revised circle rate on the sale deed date should apply under Section 50C. The HC held that since the transaction value was commensurate with the circle rate at the material time of the original agreement, subsequent circle rate increases would not affect Section 50C application. The decision followed the precedent in Modipon Limited, confirming that the proviso to Section 50C does not apply retrospectively when the original transaction value matched prevailing circle rates.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.