Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner accused in money laundering charges involving bribery of rice millers for approving sub-standard rice. The petitioner sought interim protection from arrest and coercive action without praying for quashing of twelve FIRs/ECIRs registered against him. The HC held the petition not maintainable, ruling that blanket protection orders cannot be granted without seeking FIR quashment. The court emphasized that accused persons must exhaust statutory remedies under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail or approach under Section 482 CrPC for quashing proceedings before filing Article 226 petitions. The HC noted that granting blanket orders would adversely affect ongoing investigations and undermine rule of law, following Supreme Court precedent in Ravuri Krishna Murthy regarding similar protection orders.
The HC dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner accused in money laundering charges involving bribery of rice millers for approving sub-standard rice. The petitioner sought interim protection from arrest and coercive action without praying for quashing of twelve FIRs/ECIRs registered against him. The HC held the petition not maintainable, ruling that blanket protection orders cannot be granted without seeking FIR quashment. The court emphasized that accused persons must exhaust statutory remedies under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail or approach under Section 482 CrPC for quashing proceedings before filing Article 226 petitions. The HC noted that granting blanket orders would adversely affect ongoing investigations and undermine rule of law, following Supreme Court precedent in Ravuri Krishna Murthy regarding similar protection orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
