Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner accused in money laundering charges involving bribery of rice millers for approving sub-standard rice. The petitioner sought interim protection from arrest and coercive action without praying for quashing of twelve FIRs/ECIRs registered against him. The HC held the petition not maintainable, ruling that blanket protection orders cannot be granted without seeking FIR quashment. The court emphasized that accused persons must exhaust statutory remedies under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail or approach under Section 482 CrPC for quashing proceedings before filing Article 226 petitions. The HC noted that granting blanket orders would adversely affect ongoing investigations and undermine rule of law, following Supreme Court precedent in Ravuri Krishna Murthy regarding similar protection orders.
The HC dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner accused in money laundering charges involving bribery of rice millers for approving sub-standard rice. The petitioner sought interim protection from arrest and coercive action without praying for quashing of twelve FIRs/ECIRs registered against him. The HC held the petition not maintainable, ruling that blanket protection orders cannot be granted without seeking FIR quashment. The court emphasized that accused persons must exhaust statutory remedies under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory bail or approach under Section 482 CrPC for quashing proceedings before filing Article 226 petitions. The HC noted that granting blanket orders would adversely affect ongoing investigations and undermine rule of law, following Supreme Court precedent in Ravuri Krishna Murthy regarding similar protection orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
