Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC allowed the writ petition challenging dismissal of rectification application concerning ITC entitlement under TNGST/CGST Act 2017. Court found petitioner established prima facie case for interference, noting amendments to Section 16 and potential limitation issues under Section 14 of Limitation Act 1963 favoring petitioner. HC observed respondent summarily rejected rectification application against assessment order without proper discussion or consideration of merits. Consequently, HC quashed the impugned order and directed respondent to pass fresh order after examining petitioner's submissions on merits. Petition disposed of with directions for reconsideration.
HC allowed the writ petition challenging dismissal of rectification application concerning ITC entitlement under TNGST/CGST Act 2017. Court found petitioner established prima facie case for interference, noting amendments to Section 16 and potential limitation issues under Section 14 of Limitation Act 1963 favoring petitioner. HC observed respondent summarily rejected rectification application against assessment order without proper discussion or consideration of merits. Consequently, HC quashed the impugned order and directed respondent to pass fresh order after examining petitioner's submissions on merits. Petition disposed of with directions for reconsideration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
