Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against denial of registration under section 12AB. The revenue contended that the assessee engaged only in commercial activities by collecting 10% management fees rather than charitable activities. The CIT(A) held the activities were business-oriented and commercial in nature, noting the assessee entered into an agreement with a private company before executing the parent agreement with NSDC. The ITAT held that for registration purposes under section 12A, the determinative factor is whether activities mentioned in the trust deed are charitable in nature, not the sequence of agreements. Finding the trust deed objects genuinely charitable, the ITAT directed the CIT(E) to grant registration under section 12A and consequential exemption under section 80G.
The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against denial of registration under section 12AB. The revenue contended that the assessee engaged only in commercial activities by collecting 10% management fees rather than charitable activities. The CIT(A) held the activities were business-oriented and commercial in nature, noting the assessee entered into an agreement with a private company before executing the parent agreement with NSDC. The ITAT held that for registration purposes under section 12A, the determinative factor is whether activities mentioned in the trust deed are charitable in nature, not the sequence of agreements. Finding the trust deed objects genuinely charitable, the ITAT directed the CIT(E) to grant registration under section 12A and consequential exemption under section 80G.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.