Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT quashed notice u/s.148 issued on 06/04/2022 for lack of proper sanctioning authority. The notice was issued more than three years from the end of relevant assessment year, requiring approval from Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner under Section 151. However, the Assessing Officer obtained sanction from Principal Commissioner who lacked authority for notices beyond three-year period. Following Supreme Court precedent in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT held Section 151 conditions are mandatory requirements. The order u/s.148A and final notice u/s.148 were issued without proper authorization, rendering entire proceedings invalid. Appeal allowed, notice quashed on jurisdictional grounds.
ITAT quashed notice u/s.148 issued on 06/04/2022 for lack of proper sanctioning authority. The notice was issued more than three years from the end of relevant assessment year, requiring approval from Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner under Section 151. However, the Assessing Officer obtained sanction from Principal Commissioner who lacked authority for notices beyond three-year period. Following Supreme Court precedent in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT held Section 151 conditions are mandatory requirements. The order u/s.148A and final notice u/s.148 were issued without proper authorization, rendering entire proceedings invalid. Appeal allowed, notice quashed on jurisdictional grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.