Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT quashed notice u/s.148 issued on 06/04/2022 for lack of proper sanctioning authority. The notice was issued more than three years from the end of relevant assessment year, requiring approval from Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner under Section 151. However, the Assessing Officer obtained sanction from Principal Commissioner who lacked authority for notices beyond three-year period. Following Supreme Court precedent in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT held Section 151 conditions are mandatory requirements. The order u/s.148A and final notice u/s.148 were issued without proper authorization, rendering entire proceedings invalid. Appeal allowed, notice quashed on jurisdictional grounds.
ITAT quashed notice u/s.148 issued on 06/04/2022 for lack of proper sanctioning authority. The notice was issued more than three years from the end of relevant assessment year, requiring approval from Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner under Section 151. However, the Assessing Officer obtained sanction from Principal Commissioner who lacked authority for notices beyond three-year period. Following Supreme Court precedent in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT held Section 151 conditions are mandatory requirements. The order u/s.148A and final notice u/s.148 were issued without proper authorization, rendering entire proceedings invalid. Appeal allowed, notice quashed on jurisdictional grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.