TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
ITAT quashed notice u/s.148 issued on 06/04/2022 for lack of proper sanctioning authority. The notice was issued more than three years from the end of relevant assessment year, requiring approval from Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner under Section 151. However, the Assessing Officer obtained sanction from Principal Commissioner who lacked authority for notices beyond three-year period. Following Supreme Court precedent in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT held Section 151 conditions are mandatory requirements. The order u/s.148A and final notice u/s.148 were issued without proper authorization, rendering entire proceedings invalid. Appeal allowed, notice quashed on jurisdictional grounds.
ITAT quashed notice u/s.148 issued on 06/04/2022 for lack of proper sanctioning authority. The notice was issued more than three years from the end of relevant assessment year, requiring approval from Principal Chief Commissioner or Chief Commissioner under Section 151. However, the Assessing Officer obtained sanction from Principal Commissioner who lacked authority for notices beyond three-year period. Following Supreme Court precedent in Union of India vs. Rajeev Bansal, ITAT held Section 151 conditions are mandatory requirements. The order u/s.148A and final notice u/s.148 were issued without proper authorization, rendering entire proceedings invalid. Appeal allowed, notice quashed on jurisdictional grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.