Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT dismissed the appeal involving denial of customs exemption under N/N. 84/97-Cus for imported Asphalt Batch Mix Plant from China. The appellant claimed exemption for project-funded machinery but officials admitted goods were not intended for permanent project use, resulting in project certificate cancellation. The tribunal held that conditional exemptions create continuing obligations, and fraud vitiates exemption claims. Despite valid project certificate at import, subsequent cancellation due to non-compliance with notification conditions constituted suppression of facts and fraudulent duty evasion. The tribunal upheld duty demand with interest under Section 28AA, invoked extended limitation period under Section 28(4) due to fraud, and imposed penalty finding blameworthy conduct and mens rea established through appellant's admissions.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal involving denial of customs exemption under N/N. 84/97-Cus for imported Asphalt Batch Mix Plant from China. The appellant claimed exemption for project-funded machinery but officials admitted goods were not intended for permanent project use, resulting in project certificate cancellation. The tribunal held that conditional exemptions create continuing obligations, and fraud vitiates exemption claims. Despite valid project certificate at import, subsequent cancellation due to non-compliance with notification conditions constituted suppression of facts and fraudulent duty evasion. The tribunal upheld duty demand with interest under Section 28AA, invoked extended limitation period under Section 28(4) due to fraud, and imposed penalty finding blameworthy conduct and mens rea established through appellant's admissions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.