Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC set aside summoning orders against three petitioners in a Section 138 NI Act case involving dishonoured security cheques. The court held that security cheques given to secure future liabilities were validly presented when debt existed, rejecting claims of misuse since the debtor company had provided signed cheques. Crucially, the court found no cause of action existed when the complaint was filed in August 2017, as Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process had commenced in January 2017 with moratorium imposed. The board of directors' powers were suspended under Section 17 IBC and vested in the Resolution Professional, eliminating their managerial authority to authorize repayment. Consequently, no vicarious liability could attach to the directors in the company's absence, and they were entitled to discharge from proceedings.
The HC set aside summoning orders against three petitioners in a Section 138 NI Act case involving dishonoured security cheques. The court held that security cheques given to secure future liabilities were validly presented when debt existed, rejecting claims of misuse since the debtor company had provided signed cheques. Crucially, the court found no cause of action existed when the complaint was filed in August 2017, as Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process had commenced in January 2017 with moratorium imposed. The board of directors' powers were suspended under Section 17 IBC and vested in the Resolution Professional, eliminating their managerial authority to authorize repayment. Consequently, no vicarious liability could attach to the directors in the company's absence, and they were entitled to discharge from proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.