Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal challenging reopening of assessment and additions under section 68. The assessee failed to file income tax return and accounts filed were found unsatisfactory by the Assessing Officer. The assessee did not specifically challenge additions under section 68 and provided no details regarding business turnover, sales, purchases, or expenses before either the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or ITAT. The tribunal found no fault in the AO's assumption of jurisdiction. Since no return was filed in response to notice under section 148, the AO correctly passed assessment order under section 144. The appeal was dismissed as the primary grounds challenging jurisdictional assumption failed.
ITAT dismissed the assessee's appeal challenging reopening of assessment and additions under section 68. The assessee failed to file income tax return and accounts filed were found unsatisfactory by the Assessing Officer. The assessee did not specifically challenge additions under section 68 and provided no details regarding business turnover, sales, purchases, or expenses before either the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) or ITAT. The tribunal found no fault in the AO's assumption of jurisdiction. Since no return was filed in response to notice under section 148, the AO correctly passed assessment order under section 144. The appeal was dismissed as the primary grounds challenging jurisdictional assumption failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
