Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT adjudicated penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 concerning overvaluation scheme for undue drawback claims and illegal export attempts. Appellant No. 1's penalty under Section 114AA was set aside as no direct involvement with subject goods was established, however penalty under Section 114(iii) was confirmed based on appellant's statement admitting container dispatch and presence during loading operations, demonstrating connivance with exporter. Appellant No. 2's penalties under both sections were upheld after tribunal found evidence of monitoring illegal export activities through WhatsApp communications and awareness of syndicate operations. Appeal disposed with mixed outcome - partial relief for Appellant No. 1, complete confirmation of penalties against Appellant No. 2.
CESTAT adjudicated penalties under Sections 114(iii) and 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 concerning overvaluation scheme for undue drawback claims and illegal export attempts. Appellant No. 1's penalty under Section 114AA was set aside as no direct involvement with subject goods was established, however penalty under Section 114(iii) was confirmed based on appellant's statement admitting container dispatch and presence during loading operations, demonstrating connivance with exporter. Appellant No. 2's penalties under both sections were upheld after tribunal found evidence of monitoring illegal export activities through WhatsApp communications and awareness of syndicate operations. Appeal disposed with mixed outcome - partial relief for Appellant No. 1, complete confirmation of penalties against Appellant No. 2.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.