Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT allowed appellant's appeal challenging classification and duty recovery on imported bus bars. The Export Oriented Unit imported goods under concessional duty exemption notification claiming classification under Chapter 85 as switchgear parts rather than tariff item 7407 1030. The tribunal held that customs authorities lacked jurisdiction to recover differential duty absent proven diversion from intended manufacturing use. For 169 bills entries from July 2018, no allegation existed of goods being used contrary to exemption conditions or cleared domestically without export. Classification accepted at import was final upon deployment for production. Regarding live consignment, presumption of eventual violation was legally impermissible. The adjudicating authority exceeded jurisdiction by revisiting assessment based on procedural disputes over operationalizing rules without establishing breach of actual user conditions or unauthorized domestic clearance.
CESTAT allowed appellant's appeal challenging classification and duty recovery on imported bus bars. The Export Oriented Unit imported goods under concessional duty exemption notification claiming classification under Chapter 85 as switchgear parts rather than tariff item 7407 1030. The tribunal held that customs authorities lacked jurisdiction to recover differential duty absent proven diversion from intended manufacturing use. For 169 bills entries from July 2018, no allegation existed of goods being used contrary to exemption conditions or cleared domestically without export. Classification accepted at import was final upon deployment for production. Regarding live consignment, presumption of eventual violation was legally impermissible. The adjudicating authority exceeded jurisdiction by revisiting assessment based on procedural disputes over operationalizing rules without establishing breach of actual user conditions or unauthorized domestic clearance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.