Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC dismissed petitioner's writ petitions challenging ED's investigation into alleged Rs. 600 crores money laundering involving IREO Group. Court held petitioner lacked locus standi under Article 226 as neither a homebuyer nor person aggrieved by corporate mismanagement. Petitions failed PIL requirements under Delhi HC PIL Rules 2010. Court refused court-monitored investigation, finding ED actively pursuing investigation at homebuyers' instance under Special Court PMLA Panchkula supervision with appropriate attachment orders issued. Petitioner failed to demonstrate ED inaction warranting judicial oversight. Court noted petitioner's suppression of material facts, misrepresentation of court orders, and false declarations regarding investor status constituted approaching court with unclean hands. All petitions dismissed for lack of locus standi and non-maintainability.
HC dismissed petitioner's writ petitions challenging ED's investigation into alleged Rs. 600 crores money laundering involving IREO Group. Court held petitioner lacked locus standi under Article 226 as neither a homebuyer nor person aggrieved by corporate mismanagement. Petitions failed PIL requirements under Delhi HC PIL Rules 2010. Court refused court-monitored investigation, finding ED actively pursuing investigation at homebuyers' instance under Special Court PMLA Panchkula supervision with appropriate attachment orders issued. Petitioner failed to demonstrate ED inaction warranting judicial oversight. Court noted petitioner's suppression of material facts, misrepresentation of court orders, and false declarations regarding investor status constituted approaching court with unclean hands. All petitions dismissed for lack of locus standi and non-maintainability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.