Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
HC set aside petitioner's GST registration cancellation under Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy. The show cause notice was deemed vague and deficient for merely citing Section 29(2)(e) regarding fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the alleged misconduct or providing hearing date/time details. Court held that noticee must be apprised of specific allegations to mount effective defense. While alternative statutory remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, HC recognized established exception for gross violations of natural justice principles. The defective notice constituted procedural unfairness in decision-making process, warranting judicial intervention regardless of available appellate mechanisms. Registration cancellation order quashed for violating audi alteram partem rule.
HC set aside petitioner's GST registration cancellation under Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy. The show cause notice was deemed vague and deficient for merely citing Section 29(2)(e) regarding fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the alleged misconduct or providing hearing date/time details. Court held that noticee must be apprised of specific allegations to mount effective defense. While alternative statutory remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, HC recognized established exception for gross violations of natural justice principles. The defective notice constituted procedural unfairness in decision-making process, warranting judicial intervention regardless of available appellate mechanisms. Registration cancellation order quashed for violating audi alteram partem rule.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
