Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
HC set aside petitioner's GST registration cancellation under Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy. The show cause notice was deemed vague and deficient for merely citing Section 29(2)(e) regarding fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the alleged misconduct or providing hearing date/time details. Court held that noticee must be apprised of specific allegations to mount effective defense. While alternative statutory remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, HC recognized established exception for gross violations of natural justice principles. The defective notice constituted procedural unfairness in decision-making process, warranting judicial intervention regardless of available appellate mechanisms. Registration cancellation order quashed for violating audi alteram partem rule.
HC set aside petitioner's GST registration cancellation under Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy. The show cause notice was deemed vague and deficient for merely citing Section 29(2)(e) regarding fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the alleged misconduct or providing hearing date/time details. Court held that noticee must be apprised of specific allegations to mount effective defense. While alternative statutory remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, HC recognized established exception for gross violations of natural justice principles. The defective notice constituted procedural unfairness in decision-making process, warranting judicial intervention regardless of available appellate mechanisms. Registration cancellation order quashed for violating audi alteram partem rule.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
