Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
HC set aside petitioner's GST registration cancellation under Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy. The show cause notice was deemed vague and deficient for merely citing Section 29(2)(e) regarding fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the alleged misconduct or providing hearing date/time details. Court held that noticee must be apprised of specific allegations to mount effective defense. While alternative statutory remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, HC recognized established exception for gross violations of natural justice principles. The defective notice constituted procedural unfairness in decision-making process, warranting judicial intervention regardless of available appellate mechanisms. Registration cancellation order quashed for violating audi alteram partem rule.
HC set aside petitioner's GST registration cancellation under Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, allowing the writ petition despite availability of alternative remedy. The show cause notice was deemed vague and deficient for merely citing Section 29(2)(e) regarding fraud, willful misstatement or suppression of facts without specifying the alleged misconduct or providing hearing date/time details. Court held that noticee must be apprised of specific allegations to mount effective defense. While alternative statutory remedies generally preclude writ jurisdiction, HC recognized established exception for gross violations of natural justice principles. The defective notice constituted procedural unfairness in decision-making process, warranting judicial intervention regardless of available appellate mechanisms. Registration cancellation order quashed for violating audi alteram partem rule.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
