Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC ruled that AO cannot invoke Section 145(3) of IT Act without expressly identifying infirmities or discrepancies in assessee's books of accounts. The court held that AO's determination of 10% net profit rate was based on pure guesswork without proper material or evidence, making it impermissible under established legal principles. The court clarified that res judicata doctrine does not apply to income tax assessment proceedings, as each year's assessment is independent and final only for that specific year. Revenue authorities cannot make assessments through conjecture without reference to supporting evidence or material. The concurrent findings of CIT (Appeals) and ITAT interfering with AO's order were upheld as legally sound, with substantial question of law decided in favour of assessee against Revenue.
HC ruled that AO cannot invoke Section 145(3) of IT Act without expressly identifying infirmities or discrepancies in assessee's books of accounts. The court held that AO's determination of 10% net profit rate was based on pure guesswork without proper material or evidence, making it impermissible under established legal principles. The court clarified that res judicata doctrine does not apply to income tax assessment proceedings, as each year's assessment is independent and final only for that specific year. Revenue authorities cannot make assessments through conjecture without reference to supporting evidence or material. The concurrent findings of CIT (Appeals) and ITAT interfering with AO's order were upheld as legally sound, with substantial question of law decided in favour of assessee against Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.