Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
