Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
