Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148 and assessment order u/s 147 read with s 144B where AO denied capital gains deduction u/s 54. AO disallowed deduction solely because legal heirs deposited sale proceeds after original assessee's death, despite proper disclosure in return and valid investment claim of Rs 3 crores against capital gains liability. Court held AO's hyper-technical approach regarding timing of deposit by legal heirs after assessee's demise provided no valid ground for reopening assessment under s 147, particularly when no tangible information existed that income had escaped assessment and legal heirs had properly disclosed property sale and claimed legitimate deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.